Women in the 18th Century | A Guest Post by Rose Melikan, PLUS Giveaway

Jane Austen, c. 1873, artist unknown

Far be it from me to criticize Jane Austen, but an unfortunate consequence of her popularity has been the assumption that Englishwomen living during the reign of George III spent all their time writing letters, attending card parties, and striving to make a “good match”. Admittedly, the Bennets, Elliots, Dashwoods et al. represent a particular segment of society, the provincial middle class, but even so, were these women really so limited in their outlook and aspirations?

Undoubtedly, some of them were. Jane Austen was too astute an observer of manners and morals to misjudge things badly. Nevertheless, some middle class women did venture beyond the parsonage and the manor house, either through necessity or the desire for a wider experience. I thought about these women when I was creating my heroine, Mary Finch. She doesn’t represent any particular person who actually lived at the end of the 18th century, but when constructing her adventures I did consider whether there was a contemporary precedent for what I was planning, or whether her strengths and weaknesses were out of line with what I knew about women of her time. So when readers ask me whether someone like Mary could really have existed in the 1790s, I say, yes, I think she could.

Hannah More, portrait by Frances Reynolds, circa 1780

Let me give you examples of two Georgian women who, in their different ways, are somewhat in the Mary Finch mold. The first is Hannah More (1745-1833). Having been taught Latin, mathematics, and foreign languages, she and her sisters ran a girls’ boarding school in Bristol, while her parents presided over a like establishment for boys. From an early age she enjoyed writing, and her work attracted the attention of the London literary elite. As a young woman she made the acquaintance of David Garrick, Sir Joshua Reynolds, and Samuel Johnson, and was invited to join the exclusive Bluestocking society. Her plays were popular and won rave reviews from the critics. A devout Anglican, More’s writing had always had a particularly moral tone, and increasingly she devoted herself to what she considered important social and political causes: education, patriotism and respect for authority, and abolition of the slave trade. In the last of these she worked closely with William Wilberforce and was a member of the Clapham Sect of Evangelical reformers. Her loyalist tracts, published during the war years, sold enormously in Great Britain and America. While of dubious literary merit, they were extremely important in providing a coherent, easily accessible platform for the forces of political, social, and religious conservatism.

Mary Wollstonecraft, portrait by John Opie circa 1797

Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797) was cut from a very different cloth. Almost entirely self-taught, she left home at the age of nineteen to escape a violent father who had squandered the family’s resources. After unsuccessful stints as schoolteacher, governess, and paid companion, she decided to become an author, and began supporting herself by writing stories, book reviews, translations, and essays. Her Thoughts on the Education of Daughters was published in 1787. While More sought to uphold values of deference, obedience, and loyalty, these were anathema to the egalitarian Wollstonecraft. She enjoyed the company of the leading radicals and rationalist thinkers of the day, including Thomas Paine, Joseph Priestley, and William Godwin, and she published the first refutation of Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France, entitled, A Vindication of the Rights of Men. In it she attacked monarchy, aristocratic privilege, and traditional institutions that promoted inequality. Her most famous work, A Vindication of the Rights of Women, took her arguments a step further, charging that women were being denied (and denying themselves) equality through a lack of rational education and a cloying celebration of feminine “sensibility”.

Similarly, while More attacked the French Revolution, Wollstonecraft defended it; indeed she travelled alone to France in 1792 to observe events firsthand, only returning in 1795. Her intrepidity was also evident in an expedition she made to Scandinavia – accompanied this time by her enfant daughter – to pursue her lover’s business interests. More never married, but Wollstonecraft’s personal life was by far the more exceptional. She had a child with a married man, and only wed William Godwin (they were both opposed in principle to the institution) when she discovered she was pregnant. They moved in together, but he also leased a separate workspace so that they could preserve their professional independence.

I don’t mean to suggest that More and Wollstonecraft were “average” women, or that their conduct passed without comment by their contemporaries. Their political views won them both support and censure, and Wollstonecraft, in particular, was strongly criticized, even by some of her friends, when she revealed that her first child had been born out of wedlock. My point is rather that despite the constraints and conventions of their time, they both managed to lead adventurous lives.

Adventurous people are necessarily unusual – and adventurous characters in novels are even more so. As Captain Holland reflects upon first making Mary Finch’s acquaintance, “He had never met a girl who said and did such odd things – and not just occasionally, but one right after the other.” Holland’s own career is not exactly straightforward, but he has never met anyone quite like Mary. He would undoubtedly have considered Hannah More and Mary Wollstonecraft rather odd as well.

About the Author
ROSE MELIKAN was born in Detroit, Michigan and grew up in nearby Dearborn. She obtained degrees in English, Law, and History at the University of Michigan and the University of Chicago before moving to Cambridge, England in 1988 to complete her Ph.D. at Gonville & Caius College. Since 1993, Rose has been a Fellow of St Catharine’s College, Cambridge, and she lectures on British Constitutional History in the University’s Law Faculty. You can read more about her academic work on her faculty page. Rose lives in Cambridge with her husband, Quentin.

Giveaway: Two paperback copies of The Mistaken Wife are up for grabs by two *international* entrants! Leave a comment on this post for one entry. Spread the word and leave a comment with a link to your tweet/blog post/sidebar posting about this giveaway for 2 entries to this giveaway. Giveaway ends 10/7.

This entry was posted in 18th Century, England, George III, Giveaways, Guest Post, Hannah More, Jane Austen, Mary Wollstonecraft, Rose Melikan. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Women in the 18th Century | A Guest Post by Rose Melikan, PLUS Giveaway

  1. Iris says:

    Such an interesting post. Of course, I know that Austen represents just one stratum of society, but it is still so easy to imagine that that is what life was like for every woman back then. You’ve also convinced me that I need to try and read a book by Hannah More, she sounds like a very interesting woman.

    I’d love to be entered into the giveaway, btw.
    Iris recently posted..In His Own Write and A Spaniard in the Works by John LennonMy ComLuv Profile

  2. K says:

    Count me in please!

  3. Colleen Turner says:

    I would love to win this! Please include me!

  4. Rose, thanks for your thoughtful post. It’s amazing how many readers (and reviewers) believe that Georgian women were expected to behave the same way as Jane Austen’s fictional women, or maybe June Cleaver. My series is set during the Southern theater of the American Revolutionary War. If women of that time had remained “angels of the home,” they’d have died.

    Suzanne Adair

  5. Elysium says:

    I have The Blackstone Key and I’d love to get this one too! Please enter me :)

    crimson_haze(at)hotmail(dot)com

  6. Amused says:

    Great post! I too agree that a lot of the historical impressions of the past are left out, like how hard it really was for women to just get by – thanks for reminding us!

    I would love to be included in this giveaway!
    Amused recently posted..Ghosts of Your PastMy ComLuv Profile

  7. librarypat says:

    What interesting women. Authors are often accused of creating unrealistic heroines when writing historical novels. Either one of these women could have been the heroine of a novel without changing much of the facts of their lives. They weren’t typical of women of the time, but they did exist. Lets face it, heroines are special and they often operate “outside the box.”

  8. Tiffany says:

    thank you so much for the opportunity – and the really interesting post!

  9. Sarah says:

    Please enter me – I enjoyed the post, and novels about adventurous historical women tend to interest me! I’ve put this one on my wishlist.

  10. Mystica says:

    Would love to be counted in for this giveaway. A very interesting post and one which I must come back to – to read again.
    Mystica recently posted..Mixed haul of books for my Mailbox TuesdayMy ComLuv Profile

  11. Terry Martini says:

    I have had this one on my wish list since I first heard about it coming out months ago. Please enter me in this giveaway and thanks for such an interesting post about women of that time period

    tmrtini at gmail dot com

  12. michelle says:

    Thanks for such an interesting post….don’t think I could have the courage these women had…..but it’s fascinating to read about them. I would love to enter this giveaway.

  13. Allison B. says:

    Thanks for this great giveaway.

  14. Carol M says:

    Please enter me! I’d love to read this!
    Thank you!

  15. Rena McGrath says:

    Thanks for having the giveaway and a chance to win Rose’s book.

    Rena

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv Enabled